Internet Archive's in-browser bookreader "theater" requires JavaScript to be enabled. It appears your browser does not have it turned on. Please see your browser settings for this feature.

What Data Do We Need, and What Data Do We Have for Monitoring Global Biodiversity?

by: Hughes, Alice

Publication date: 2025-12-30
Usage: Attribution 4.0 International
Topics: indicators, biodiversity targets, data gaps, data standards, environmental policy
Publisher: Pensoft Publishers
Collection: biodiversity
Contributor: Pensoft Publishers
Language: English
Rights: https://biodiversitylibrary.org/permissions
Rights-holder: Copyright held by individual article author(s).
Volume: 9
Item Size: 1.3M

Abstract: Globally we are beginning to realise the need for environmental policies to be built on evidence. For example, the recent Kunming- Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) is underpinned by a monitoring framework built on a selection of indicators designed to track progress towards GBF targets. Yet, any indicator is only as good as the data used to develop it, thus understanding the limitations and assumptions in environmental data that provides the basis for indicators is crucial.
The exponential growth in the availability of diverse types of ecological data has seemingly changed the problem for many ecologists trying to understand the natural world from having insufficient data to approach many ecological questions, to one of how to usefully analyse ever growing volumes of data. Yet despite this huge volume of data, biases within the data require caution to ensure their sensible use, as biases may shape the outcomes of analysis and potentially misrepresent true ecological patterns. These shortcomings have fundamental implications for the use of this data to identify trends and patterns in biodiversity, and thus for our ability to provide what is needed for science-driven policy. Here I discuss data needs, and limitations, then provide recommendations to guide sensible and effective use and interpretation of data. I discuss frameworks and standard pipelines to enable more effective use of data, and better approaches for the generation of further data to aid the development of effective conservation, policy and management. I also discuss examples of science-driven indicators currently used within policy, such as ecological conservation redlines to provide case-studies of how science can directly and effectively be used within spatial prioritisation and management. Finally, I highlight priorities ahead for both research, and biodiversity targets, as well as discussing short and longterm solutions as we fill knowledge gaps and develop more accurate model approaches.
Addeddate: 2026-02-13 00:43:53
Bhl_virtual_titleid: 210882
Bhl_virtual_volume: v.9 (2025)
Call number: 10_3897_biss_9_183444
Call-number: 10_3897_biss_9_183444
Foldoutcount: 0
Genre: article
Identifier: whatdatadowenee9hugh
Identifier-ark: ark:/13960/s27xrs3s9vb
Identifier-bib: 10_3897_biss_9_183444
Identifier-doi: 10.3897/biss.9.183444
Ocr: tesseract 5.3.0-6-g76ae
Ocr_detected_lang: en
Ocr_detected_lang_conf: 1.0000
Ocr_detected_script: Latin
Ocr_detected_script_conf: 1.0000
Ocr_module_version: 0.0.21
Ocr_parameters: -l eng
Page_number_confidence: 0
Page_number_module_version: 1.0.5
Page_range: 1-2
Pages: 2
Pdf_degraded: invalid-jp2-headers
Pdf_module_version: 0.0.25
Possible copyright status: In copyright. Digitized with the permission of the rights holder.
Ppi: 300
Source: Biodiversity Information Science and Standards 9
Year: 2025